Responding to mainstream media bias --
interspersed with moderate views,
frequent spews and *masticulated* chews.






Perish the Thought!


If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

I'm much more attractive online.
You were expecting someone svelte and cutsie behind all this insight and wit? Perish THAT thought!

Well, the svelte part, anyway.

From politics (moderates who lean to the right) to Pogo (drools during poker stare) to rants (Whatcha expect from savvy, sassy sexagenarians?) to raves (Have you had your kudo today?) -- we never take ourselves too seriously.

We do, however, reserve the right to slaughter an occasional sacred cow. And in case we fail to mention it -- we will never forget....


~~~~~~~~



The Soros' Straw Man

-- Socialist Dreams
-- One World Order
-- Illinois Senate Years
-- U.S. Senate Days
-- Hidden Agenda(s)
-- Oblamanomics
-- Energy Plan(s)
-- Issues & Topics
-- Terrorism/Iraq
-- Questionable Associates
-- O's Communities
-- ACORN $$
-- Obamamobile
-- BARRACUDA!
-- BO Owns Wall Street
-- Wall Street Owns BO


~~~~~~~~~~



Because we said we are.
Now mind your elders.



News-Views-Spews



GATHERING OF EAGLES
WHY DO EAGLES GATHER?
Why They Gathered 3/17/07


~~~~~~~~~~

Mitt Romney:
Class and Competence

... this blog is proud to have said:



[categories]








Standing With
Standing with Israel
Israel




SUPPORTING C.A.I.I. MEMBERS




WAKE UP, AMERICA!

I AM JOHN DOE.

THE RIGHT WORDS




STOP THE ACLU



Blogs Against the NYT



Reject the UN




American Flag League



TEXAS CONNECTION



VICTORY CAUCUS COALITION






Blog Visitors

The Old North State -- from Manteo to Murphy -- and ahhhhh, The Blue Ridge Mountains .... I love calling North Carolina home!"



Atom Feed
RSS Feed






CROSSING BALSAM
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 4
Chapter 6
Chapter 8

T-P
B-P





<< January 2008 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31






rss feed

© 2001-2009 Perish the Thought Associates. Contents are the property of contributors. If you steal anything, we WILL hunt you down and hurt you.

 
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Libs Beginning to Eat Their Own?

Bob Parks hits on a theme that's been circulating the blogosphere for a few days -- how MSNBC's Chrissie Matthews has hard-balled (pun intended)  himself from his liberal fan-base.

... he apparently crossed the line when appearing on January 9th's "Morning Joe", he said this about Hillary….

"The reason she may be a front-runner is her husband messed around" and that "she didn't win there (New York) on her merits."

He's also called her, "she devil", a "strip-teaser", "witchy", a "Madame Defarge", and "Nurse Ratched". Men who support her, according to Matthews are "castratos in the eunuch chorus". He's said Clinton is not "a convincing mom" and "modern women" like Hillary won't cut it with Midwest guys."

Wow.  Why not just say what you think, Chrissie?

While moi and mega-others agree with the shrilly-voiced one -- we're more accustomed to Chrissy delivering complex one-sentence discourses in lieu of straight questions to conservatives.

Sexist?  Yep.

Biased?  Of course.

But don't take my word for it.  Read Bob's article for an up-close and personal view of Chrissie's butt in a liberal buzz saw.

Go ahead.  Smile.

 


Posted at 05:40 pm by Gull
Make a comment  




 
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Watching the MI Returns....

If you're a regular reader, you know who I'm pulling for to win the gold in Michigan.  Even without Mitt Romney's working knowledge of economics -- he deserves to win on the basis of other credible criteria. 

OKOKOK -- for the unconvinced, I'll list them:

his experience in reducing taxes
his stand on life-values
his organizational skills
his faith in the American process
his executive experiences
his program to control illegal immigration
his stance on fiscal responsibility
his plans for state-based healthcare plans
his positions on conservative social issues
his knowledge of Muslim extremism
his focus on a strong military
his ideas on tax credits for middle Americans
and -- in incomparable awareness of economics.

Tonight I'll spend a couple of hours "live blogging" the Michigan election returns.  I'll focus primarily on CNN (gag) because they appear to be more "fair and balanced" in election coverage.  Not that FoxNews doesn't wear the moniker, but too many of their reports/comments are slanted for Rudy or Fred ....

More later -- polls will close in approximately 35 minutes.

8:08 --   Listening to CNN folks discuss why Romney should win .... Personally -- I think the MSM is setting itself up to downplay a Mitt win in Michigan .... yawn.

Let's see .... he's from Michigan .... his dad was a 3-term governor.  According to the MSM, that's about it. 

Wrong.  Probably less than half of voters today knew Mitt Romney as a former Michigan kid or knew his dad.  They have, however, heard him speak over the last few months.  I have the distinct feeling that if Mitt does win in Michigan --- it's because of his message: promoting R&D in the auto industry, tax cuts and reining in spending.

What role will independents play in the Michigan outcome?  This will be interesting .... 

On McCain's economic message .... he admitted he didn't know much about economics and deferred at least one question to the former HP leader ... Not a good sign.  An even less-good sign for McCain is that he's becoming a one-issue (military/national security) candidate.  National security is important, but Americans are also concerned about fiscal security, savings and rising taxes, unemployment, rising costs of food and fuel.

Immigration:  I've not heard much talk about it from McCain .... neither McC nor MSM nor democrats want the issue of illegal immigration a headline topic.  Who among us would not try our hand at picking lettuce for $50 an hour?   McCain should NOT have offered that salary as an "incentive" to support his amnesty policy.

Early returns (according to FoxNews -- and yes, I'm flip-flopping between channels now), indicate Romney's lead after 1% returns will hold .... Romney seems to be scoring significantly among Republicans (according to Fox) .... Rationale:  it's the economy, stupid. 

McCain's military plug .... I'm still not impressed.  If he's so inclined to remind us of his military service --- why has he not been a proponent of military healthcare?  I've blogged my reservations about McCain's military "status" before .... I don't believe the hype.  He was not subjected to the treatment other POW's received ... he was considered "American royalty" because of his father's status as an admiral ... he left 20 pounds heavier than when he was captured ... his military record prior to capture was nothing to write home about.  Instead -- had he not been an admiral's son, he would have likely been discharged.

Romney's case -- leader for the future .... the economy, the healthcare, revitalizing education, fighting radical jhidism .... (per Kevin Madden) ... Romney to SC to make his case across all issues ....

Romney and the Mo-jo from Michigan .... moving forward. 

Not sure I believe this:  a senior Romney official told someone at Fox that a Romney loss in Michigan would be a death-blow to his campaign .... I'd call it a major set-back, but not a death-blow .... but what do I know. 

FoxNews is reporting that there is an email criticizing McCain's military record being circulated in SC .... based on what I observed above -- it is not surprising.  There were thousands of heroes in Vietnam who have lead productive lives without wearing their military experiences on their sleeves ...

Break time ---- waiting for Huckabee to speak.

Back at 8:55 ET -- Still waiting for the Huckster ....

Meanwhile, I received this link to a breaking AP story about McCain's POW experience:

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) - Supporters of Republican John McCain on Tuesday assailed a mailer sent to state newspaper editors claiming he sold out fellow POWs to get better treatment while held prisoner in Vietnam.

"Nothing could be further from the truth. I know because I was there," Orson Swindle, a retired Marine lieutenant colonel and former prisoner of war, said in a statement about the mailing from Vietnam Veterans Against John McCain.

The group's organizer, Jerry Kiley, who said he also is a Vietnam veteran, said in a telephone phone interview that he has been trying for years to spread what he said is the truth about McCain's record.

"John McCain has created this myth that he is a hero and he is not," Kiley said from his home in Garnerville, N.Y.

Kiley's group cites as evidence a May 1973 U.S. News & World Report article by McCain in which he said he realized, on his third or fourth day of captivity after his plane was shot down in 1967, that his knee was so swollen the blood might pool in it and kill him. So he offered to give military information to his captors in exchange for medical treatment.

In the article, McCain said he told the story to make the point that the North Vietnamese only gave medical treatment to POWs if they thought they were going to get something in return. He did not say that he went through with his end of the deal.

Kiley claims information McCain gave to the North Vietnamese led to an increase in U.S. planes being shot down.

McCain's spokesman, B.J. Boling, said McCain never passed military information to the North Vietnamese. He said the campaign was publicizing the mailer "to serve as an example of how we can bring these shadowy groups out into the open."

Kiley said his group sent the mailing to 80 newspaper editors. He said he is considering sending the information to editors in states with later primaries. South Carolina's Republican primary is Saturday.

McCain's state supporters have created what they call a "Truth Squad" to counter the kind of negative attacks that derailed his candidacy here in 2000.

Four years ago in the Democratic presidential race, a group calling itself Swift Boat Veterans For Truth ran television ads that challenged Democratic nominee John Kerry's service record in Vietnam.

Will it separate McCain from his hero banner?  I don't know -- but we should all expect John Kerry to come to his rescue.  After all -- it was McCain who "defended" Kerry against the Swift Boaters .... Interesting fireworks should be expected ....  This may be the shot that turns McGruff into a raging Deaniac.

FoxNews declares Romney winner at 9:02 pm.  This should bring the wolves outta their dens.

Fox's "Campaign Cameron" is softening his Romney-speak right now .... Wonder why?  Surely he's not fishing for an interview?  An invite to the Mitt-Mobile?   A bag of Ann's cookies?   A ride on the family flight to SC?

Still waiting on Huckabee .... here he is ..... Chuck is near .... He congratulates Mitt ... in the same breath, he declares he will win SC ... SC best listen to the man annointed by God ... maybe God will burn a bush for the Huckster as he works throughout the night to re-write the Constitution ....   Huckabee suggests that if folks aren't going to vote for him, supporters should let the air out of their tires.  I can suggest who needs to let the air out.  And it has nothing to do with tires.

John McCain now speaking .... this oughta be good ....

"We don't mind a fight" .... cut-away to Mitt ....

Mitt Speaks .... "a come-back for America." 

"A victory for optimism over Washington pessimism" .... Washington is broken and we're going to do something about it ... America understands --- Washington told us they'd do blah blah blah ..... but they haven't. 

Voter breakdowns for Romney:

Republicans    41%
Conservatives  45%
Independents    39%
Evangelicals  34% 
Men  36%
Women   39%

More info later .... Until then, enjoy the victory, Romney supporters --  and let the pundits and MSM prep us for Saturday's battle in South Carolina!

 


Posted at 06:55 pm by Gull
Comment (1)  




 
Sunday, January 13, 2008
McCain and National Security: On Golden Pond

The Detroit News is likely priming its readers for a McCain endorsement, if the story line it ran today is any indictor ....

John McCain made innumerable false and misleading statements about Mitt Romney's positions and credentials on several issues, including national security.  Granted, McCain's criticisms were made in a campaign speech, but I'm wondering if he will be asked to defend these claims in a debate? 

And on that thought --

What specific experience has McCain had in national security?  He crashed planes; he broke under VC pressure; he commanded a state-side Navy squad; he crooned his solution to Iran by altering the Beach Boys' "bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran" lyrics; he's been in the Senate 20+ years. 

Impressive. 

Sitting in on briefings is hardly "experience" or evidence of decision-making.

Mitt speaks fluently on issues that McCain only blabbers about.  IMO -- securing the 2002 Olympics would be more "experience" than any briefing McCain may have ever attended.

If there's a remake of "On Golden Pond," John McCain should audition.  He'd be perfect as Norman Thayer. 

Plus, he's already a loon ....


Posted at 11:12 pm by Gull
Make a comment  




McCain's "Straight Talk" U-Turn

From Town Hall's HH:

Senator McCain has also been quick to charge Romney with flip-flops, but the Arizona maverick went from a Thursday night debate lecture on how Michigan jobs were gone and not coming back to extolling his optimism about the ability of Detroit to get those jobs back.

The Straight-Talk U-Turn: 
"We can restore Detroit's supremacy in the automotive world," McCain said at the Andiamo Celebrity Showroom. "I'm optimistic."

I'm also optimistic. 

Optimistic that Mitt will deservedly receive a victory in Michigan.


 


Posted at 03:16 pm by Gull
Make a comment  




 
Friday, January 11, 2008
Hillary's Namesake; Mitt in MI; Fox Unbalanced

I was wondering today if Her Thighness would be attending memorial services for her namesake, Sir Edmund.  Maybe send flowers?   Lay a wreath on the slopes of Everest? 

You remember how Hillary and Bill claimed that she was named after Sir Edmund, don't you?   Neither Hill, Bill nor the MSM have ever corrected that false claim:  Sir Edmund Hillary and his Sherpa guide, Tenzing Norgay, became known to the world in 1953, after becoming the first men to reach Everest's summit. Sen. Clinton was born in 1947

My wish is that she and Bill personally climb the slopes and lay that wreath.  Somewhere between swings between Nevada and South Carolina.

.......

Mitt in Michigan .... It's going to be difficult.  But I'm optimistic.  Supporters must remember that tallies in both Iowa and NH were foiled by a liberal base.  Neither Huckabee nor McCain have faced a truly conservative voter-base. 

I want Mitt to continue to hit hard on the problems in Washington.  I want him to remind voters that (fine man that he is yadayadayada) McCain has been part of the problem in Washington .... McCain has been no friend to conservatism; no friend to the issues of immigration, free speech, ethics, low taxes. 

I want Mitt to demonstrate his expertise in economics.  He must set his own agenda and refuse to be distracted.  He must remain optimistic about the revival of the auto industry market.  He must remind voters that, while education and retraining are critical to industry revival, McCain's trillion-dollar educational reform package is not going to relieve the state's economy.  And no one has yet asked McCain how he's going to pay for it .... ASK!

As for Kos suggesting that dems cross over and vote for Mitt, come on over, kidlets!  You crossed-over in NH -- what's new?  The "newness" will be in getting it right this time!

.........

I'm sick of FoxNews.  No matter what is said, there's always a Rudy undertone .... This may become the chink in their "fair and balanced" armor.  Even CNN "out-viewed" them during the last debate coverage.  Not a good sign.  Especially when their concept of an "all star" panel to discuss the Republican debate consists of democrats.

Disclaimer:  I have and will continue to contribute to Mitt Romney's campaign.  Sean Hannity needs to declare his fundraising support for Rudy.  Everyone else has to .... why not Sean? 

And get those damn democrat "all stars" out of a "fair and balanced" discussion of Republican candidates.

..........

Luntz focus groups and approval ratings:  Are we surprised that quips and snippy one-liners rank high?  One problem (for me, at least):  I don't want to be entertained by a President.  I want a POTUS who responds with sound decisions -- not sound bytes.

.........

Reckon John Kerry would accept the V-P slot with Obama?  Nahhh.  He just wants to be on-stage again.  He probably wanted to upstage Al Gore's Obama endorsement .... That'll leave a bruise on Hill's ego.  Not.

..............

Excuse me while I continue my second z-pack to knock out this "walking pneumonia."   The more I hack and cough and wheeze, the more convinced I am that the best cure-all remains a hunk of cornbread crumbled in a bowl of pintos, smothered with raw onions with a sprinkle of garlic.  Might not cure every ill, mind you -- but it will keep others at a safe distance ....

 


Posted at 02:12 am by Gull
Comment (1)  




 
Monday, January 07, 2008
Romney: Today FOR Tomorrow

If you have any doubts about how badly America needs Mitt Romney, replay the video. 

We need Mitt Romney.  Today.  Tomorrow.

 


Posted at 01:45 pm by Gull
Make a comment  




Romney on Leadership

... And defines why other candidates may not qualify --

We need Mitt Romney.

 


Posted at 12:25 am by Gull
Comment (1)  




 
Saturday, January 05, 2008
It's Romney vs MSM, Huck and McCain

Make no bones about it.  Mitt Romney is facing the battle of his political life.  Not just in New Hampshire.  Not just in Iowa.  In every state.  In the headlines of newspapers, in the lead stories in alleged "news" reports and on the Internet via allegedly unbiased bloggers.

With the MSM (including Fox news) portraying Mitt's "comparison" ads as negative -- while ignoring the personal attack ads by the Huckster and John McCain -- it's going to be a fight to the finish.  Keep up the campaign, Mitt.  America needs you.

The Huckabee affront to honesty and Christian ethics:  He announced that he was going to withdraw his negative ad against Mitt --- yet it ran ten times on three Iowa stations ....  In addition:

Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee personally apologized to rival Mitt Romney previously about a disparaging remark Huckabee made about Romney's Mormon religion. But Huckabee's Web site continues to host comments blasting the Mormon faith and littered with rhetoric about Mormonism.  Source

Factcheck also notes:

The ad Huckabee said he decided not to run has now appeared at least three times in Iowa anyway. It accuses Romney of being "dishonest" but shades the facts in the process.

Update, Jan. 4: The ad ran at least 10 times on four different stations in Davenport and Cedar Rapids, Iowa. The Huckabee campaign called those airings a mistake.

In another ad Huckabee claims to have signed the most broad-based tax cut in Arkansas history. But as we've noted repeatedly, he signed bigger tax increases than cuts.

Huckabee's ad .... misleads when it holds Romney accountable for the state health care program's coverage of abortion. The Romney campaign points out that the former governor was not the one who made the decision to provide abortion coverage for a $50 co-pay. Indeed, the health care legislation Romney signed declared that an independent agency, the Commonwealth Connector, would implement the law and would "develop criteria for plans eligible for premium assistance payments." (The state subsidizes coverage for those making less than 300 percent of the federal poverty level.)

News groups hint at the likelihood (ha!) that the Huckster rode a wave of bigotry to win in Iowa.  And he had a bunch of support --- namely, John McCain who chose not to run in Iowa.  An alliance between Huck and McCain?  Of course.  It's that historic alliance of convenience ....

And John McCain -- the most backstabbing, inconsistent and anti-conservative candidate in modern history -- has the MSM ignoring his use of negative, personal attacks.

Media Matters contradicts the "McCain claim that 'negative campaigns don't work,' ignored his own negative ads ...."

Similarly, the Washington Post (and here), the AP, the Los Angeles Times, the Politico, and USA Today all reported McCain's statement that "negative campaigns don't work" without noting that he has run negative ads of his own.

And just wait until pundits begin to talk about Soros financial link to McCain's PAC.....

Fair and Balanced?  We know what to expect from MSM, but is FoxNews now slanting their reporting?

Hannity helped raise funds for Rudy .... Dick Morris, a regular analyst for The Factor and Hannity, is an adviser to Huckabee .... former-Speaker Newt Gingrich, another regular guest on Fox, is also being touted as a Huckabee adviser (see the joint health care article linked previously and the fact that Newt's top staffer has joined Huckabee's staff) ....  Why must the wife of a Romney advisor who is also a frequent analyst routinely state her husband's status?  Is there any correlation to Fox News current slanting of reporting showing it's disfavor of Mitt's candidacy?   If not --- how do they explain the obvious bias of it's "fair and balanced" coverage by Carl Cameron -- or in particular, the rude shouting match between Greta (the legal analyst) and Shep (hyperventilating cute guy) last Tuesday night during a guest-spot with a Senator representing Romney? 

What gives, FoxNews?  Will the king of cable's "fair and balanced" act have to change it slogan?

Mitt Romney's campaign is the one I support.  In the short and long run, he faces a major challenge.  To win, he needs openness and unbiased access to the most "open" new agency.  I'm beginning to question, however, the subtle role FoxNews is trying to play in "re-defining" the conservative base.

It may just play into the hands of the MSMand liberal democrat groups -- those bastions of opponents to all that is "fair and balanced."

 


Posted at 12:28 pm by Gull
Comments (10)  




 
Tuesday, January 01, 2008
Happy New Year ....

Possibly this video will also  "move" you to re-examine your priorities for the coming year .... to be kinder, more understanding, more accepting, more appreciative of our friends and families, our freedoms, our blessings -- and of those who have historically defended our rights to believe, to cherish, to hope, to pray, to love, to share ....

Happy New Year, America!


Posted at 12:30 pm by Gull
Make a comment  




 
Monday, December 31, 2007
The Real John Wayne McCain

Don't be fooled by the swagger or the boots ---

I've always held the Vietnam vet in high esteem.  I was with them -- literally and figuratively -- and experienced first-hand the harassment and spite they have endured.  That being said -- I have historically distrusted John McCain for how he has used his military service (particularly as a POW) as a crutch to further his political career. 

His political career always has that subliminal disclaimer: "...yeah, but he was a military hero ..."   As if he's "entitled" to forgiveness when straying from his conservative roots.


My contention is that, had his father not been an admiral, his lack-luster record (including the loss of at least 2 airplanes) would have gotten him thrown out of the military or notably demoted.  For whatever he didn't accomplish -- it was not until his POW status that he gained any esteem. 

Is this relevant to his run for an office to which he has always aspired?

I think so.  There are too many correlations and incidents of self-service, entitlements and compromise in his background to qualify him as a reliable conservative candidate for POTUS.  Much less as commander-in-chief in a volatile time.
 

If you choose to disagree -- fine.  But when you do, keep in mind his voting record, his defense of amnesty, his history of sanctions by his peers, his emotional instability, his flip-flops and inconsistencies in promoting basic conservative tenets. 

----------------

From 
Pat Murphy:

Those who've known John McCain since he began his Arizona political career two decades ago made two mistakes. First, we underestimated the Washington media's gullibility for a political schmooze job. Second, we underestimated McCain's mastery in reincarnating himself as a lovable maverick glowing with political virtue and amiable charm while camouflaging his bullyboy and deceitful ways.

If McCain were to become president, Americans would wake up to more than a commander-in-chief with a prickly temperament and a low boiling point. McCain is a man who carries get-even grudges. He cannot endure criticism. He threatens. He controls by fear.  He's consumed with self-importance. He shifts blame. McCain's thin skin and demand to have it his way have been obvious since infancy, when he held his breath until he was unconscious, and later in Washington, where he has resorted to pushing and shoving colleagues when irritated.


McCain is a man obsessed with political ambitions but plagued by self-destructive petty impulses. It was vintage McCain who exploded when the Arizona Republic questioned whether the man dubbed "Senator Hothead" in Washington is fit to be entrusted with presidential powers. Instead of conceding what's common knowledge about his volcanic personality, McCain exploded in denial, blaming a newspaper vendetta and George W. Bush for "orchestrating" the criticism. When his claims drew snickers, McCain shifted to another explanation: He explodes when he sees "injustice."


But this sort of blame-fixing works where it counts--with reporters who've come to blindly lionize McCain as a high-minded champion of political virtue fighting demons of political corruption. Perhaps McCain's master stroke in inoculating himself from serious media

scrutiny was his early fusillade of confessions--his adultery ruined his first marriage, the Keating Five scandal was a blemish on his reputation, he indulged in wild and reckless misbehavior as an Annapolis midshipman. He finally endeared himself to the media with

his Quixotic promise to reform campaign financing and by holding court with reporters aboard his "Straight Talk Express" bus.


The new journalism of dwelling on personalities rather than tedious investigative digging gives McCain a free ride from the national media. Swooning media ensure McCain special treatment in the right places: 60 Minutes correspondent Mike Wallace cooed on the air that he likes McCain so much, he might leave TV to become his press secretary. Salon's Jake Tapper dubbed him "basically just a cool dude." Newsmen of another generation note that reporters covering McCain also are reluctant to seem tough on a man with McCain's painful experience as a prisoner of war.


One who hasn't been so quick to fall in line is Washington Post columnist David Broder, who warned on NBC's Meet the Press that "after the experience we all had with President Clinton [ignoring Arkansas reports of his misdeeds], I'm not inclined to discount the view of home-state reporters and journalists who have covered a candidate over the years." A few enterprising non-Arizona journalists have peeled back the McCain veneer. Boston Globe reporter Walter Robinson spent several weeks digging into McCain's Arizona behavior and reporting his dark side. Ditto Ted Rose of Brill's Content. And the acknowledged Arizona media expert on

McCain, reporter Amy Silverman of the Phoenix New Times (more on her later), gave readers of Playboy a McCain portrait not found elsewhere. ABC's Sam Donaldson came close to giving millions of viewers a clearer picture in a taped interview with Silverman for 20/20. But

the segment was canceled the night before airing, fueling speculation that McCain's oversight of broadcasters as Senate Commerce Committee chairman makes the networks wary of offending him. Several years ago, when NBC refused to support his TV-rating system, McCain wrote a letter to NBC President Robert Wright, threatening to ask the FCC to review licenses of the network's locally owned stations.


I'm among the swelling ranks of onetime McCain acquaintances ostracized for not being slavishly loyal. After McCain settled in Arizona with his young second wife, a millionaire, he asked me at dinner for help with a political career. As editorial page editor (and later publisher) of the Arizona Republic, I declined to be his political coach. However, we socialized, including dinners at his home. We even discussed writing a book. The relationship ended, however, when our newspaper exposed McCain as a liar who used an underhanded political trick.


Here is what happened: McCain boasted to my wife and me over lunch in Washington that he had planted complex questions with the Senate Interior Committee chairman to sabotage the testimony of Arizona Gov. Rose Mofford, a Democrat, about the Central Arizona Project, the multibillion-dollar Colorado River water delivery system for Arizona urban areas. When I protested to McCain that the project had enjoyed bipartisan support for nearly 50 years, from conservative Barry Goldwater to liberal Morris Udall, McCain retorted: "I'm duty bound to embarrass a Democrat whenever I can."


When reporters later asked McCain about planted questions, he feigned insult and injury and denied any such ploy. Editors in Phoenix were informed of McCain's deceit. After a news story and editorial appeared, McCain went into meltdown, shrieking on the phone: "I know you're out to get me!" (Several years later, McCain admitted the dirty trick and apologized to Mofford, who was then out of office.)


When Barbara Barrett, wife of Intel CEO Craig Barrett, ran against McCain's protégé, Gov. Fife Symington, McCain offered to buy her out of the 1994 GOP primary. She refused. Furious, McCain threatened revenge. Barrett lost, but Symington later was forced out of office after being convicted of seven counts of fraud (his conviction was overturned and is under appeal). McCain's wife was a front-row regular at Symington's criminal trial in Phoenix. McCain still calls Symington "my friend."


While Barrett, a successful attorney, emerged mostly unscathed, others weren't so lucky. Maricopa County (Phoenix) schools superintendent Sandra Dowling, a Republican, refused McCain's demand to abandon support of Barrett. Dowling told Morley Safer during a 60 Minutes interview about Arizona politics (which never aired) that McCain exploded and threatened to "destroy" her. Thereafter, her son lost his appointment to the U.S. Naval Academy, where McCain sits as an ex officio member of the Board of Visitors. McCain denied any connection.

Even former Arizona Attorney General Grant Woods, McCain's onetime senior aide who

considered succeeding him in Congress, was purged from the senator's circle for investigating Symington and refusing to seek McCain's advice as a loyal understudy.


More of McCain's style:


McCain indulges in hypocrisy with a flair. He attacks tobacco but ignores alcohol. Why? His wife's millions flow from the family beer and wine distributorship, Arizona's largest.

The affable, candid, gregarious candidate, who mingles with reporters and yuks it up in the back of the bus, is no friend of free speech, and merely tolerates and uses the press as part of his political strategy. In Arizona, McCain tries to subdue reporters by threatening to have them fired when he's displeased with their pieces. Upset about critical reporting in the Phoenix New Times by Amy Silverman, McCain complained to her father, Richard, general manager of the Salt River Project, an Arizona hydroelectric utility. McCain's intent seemed clear: muscling the federally chartered SRP in hopes Silverman would pressure his daughter to back off.


One of my Arizona neighbors, Dianne Smith, wrote McCain protesting his criticism of Anita Hill in confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas. A widow then in her sixties, Smith was flabbergasted when McCain telephoned her, shouting at her for "questioning my integrity."


McCain promised Arizona voters, "I've never tried to exploit my Vietnam service to my country because it would be totally inappropriate." But his presidential campaign is festooned with reminders of his POW years, from campaign videos to speeches to best-selling books, trying to capture the veterans vote.


Even as he moralizes about corrupt corporate money, McCain rakes in hundreds of thousands of dollars from Washington lobbyists and asks corporations for use of their jets for campaigning. Last year, the Washington Post documented thousands of dollars of donations to McCain's political war chest from K Street lobbyists who do business before the Senate Commerce Committee.


McCain himself has acknowledged that he intervenes before regulatory agencies with letters on behalf of campaign donors, but claims he's merely performing a "constituent service"--the same explanation he used when initially defending himself in the Keating Five scandal. As a peevish lobbyist told Newsweek: "He sees no connection between twisting our arms for money and then talking about how corrupt the system is."


The John McCain glamorized by the national media is a total stranger to Arizonans who are painfully familiar with a far coarser and more foreboding man. His victory in the New Hampshire primary may bring greater scrutiny. Instead of treating him as a lovable maverick and quotable long shot, the national media that have been fawning over him are certain to begin digging seriously into the McCain background that has turned so many of his home-state Republicans against him.

 


Posted at 11:29 am by Gull
Comments (3)  




Next Page
Perish the Thought!
Perish the Thought! Perish the Thought! Perish the Thought!